From the other day:
From sunbeam, a meme:
Post lines 6, 7 and 8 of page 123 of the book that is closest to you:
…
Splitting and splattering
Spilling and spoiling
Spellbound: the sprite
The book in question is “A journey through time in verse and rhyme”, also known as the essential Waldorf teacher’s poetry cheat-sheet. (Just kidding.)
I’m not sure how many people I need to tag, and Marianthi is already taken (damn!), so it’ll have to be Martijn, Christos and Laura. Also, the Pinefox, if he wants to use my comments’ box for this purpose.
Finally, from the addictive Spell with Flickr:























I love the reference that the book is the essential Waldorf cheat sheet! I have felt like that since the day I purchased it! I bet I used that book three times a week in teaching my children!
Forgive my jumping in, I was just browsing blogs and saw your post. Many blessings!
Melisa
But comments are for jumping in, Melisa. Welcome!
happy birthday dimitra :) you had the cuttest candles!!
I’ve spent the last half hour spelling my name with flick, addictive indeed!!
(oh, and thanks for doing the meme :)
um, do these Lines have to be lines of poetry, or what? Or do you want fragments of long sentences which will presumably begin and end before and after lines 6 and 8?
or do you mean the 6th, 7th and 8th *sentences* of prose to commence on p.123 of the relevant book?
Very good questions. I have seen this done elsewhere as the 6th, 7th and 8th sentence which makes more sense, doesn’t it? I kind of cheated by choosing the poetry book when there was a pile of them next to me…
OK, here goes (though for me the closest book is a bit of a relative category, I am surrounded by them – this one is at the end of the shelf nearest me): p.123, 6th-8th sentences:
Yet his project is continuous with Heidegger’s in that he, too, wants to find words which get us “beyond” metaphysics – words which have force apart from us and display their own contingency.
Many of Derrida’s admirers, notably Rodolph Gasche, read his earlier work in this way. But Gasche begins his book by saying that he will not discuss Glas or Derrida’s work after The Truth in Painting, and that he puts aside “the delicate question of what is to be counted as more philosophical or more literarily playful”.
[from Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony & Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989)]
[...] tagged me in a meme, where I had to post lines 6, 7 and 8 of page 123 of the book that’s closest to [...]
trackback: http://www.sprinkledpepper.net/diaries/archives/three-things/trackback